|
Antigonish Review
# 133
| Deborah Stiles |
|

Featured Artist
Carol Hoorn Fraser
|
|
Divisions of the Heart: Elizabeth Bishop and the Art
of Memory and Place
Edited by Sandra Barry, Gwendolyn Davies, and Peter Sanger.
(Gaspereau Press, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, 320 pp., $32.95)
|
It is perhaps in that strange, simultaneous comprehension of joy and
loss that a poet's finest art is both created and appreciated. Certainly,
in Divisions of the Heart: Elizabeth Bishop and the Art of Memory and
Place these two seemingly contradictory elements of joy and loss are
explored and celebrated, primarily through what John Barrell (in analyzing
John Clare's work) terms a "sense of place." Divisions of the Heart
is the result of a 1998 conference held on Bishop at Acadia University;
it has twenty-five of the papers presented at that symposium in which
to examine - sometimes critically, sometimes not so critically - how Elizabeth
Bishop's art treats space, both physical and mental. The extremes of joy
and loss, bound up in the landscapes of the mind as well as the Earth,
seem to be a very useful way to approach the Pulitzer Prize winning poet's
work; it is this theme, or rather, an understanding of it, that emerges
from this anthology.
The volume is organized in two main sections: Place/Memory, and The
Art of Division. Each contains eleven essays. Place/Memory, the first
of these sections, follows this theme most closely. Laura Jehn Menides'
essay, for example, contends that "the comic is as important as the tragic"
in Bishop's work. Citing "The Country Mouse," and also the Geography
III opening poem, "In the Waiting Room," Menides suggests that Bishop's
humour has often been overlooked in previous analyses. The Art of Division
section, in contrast, is a bit more free-ranging. The section offers everything
from Bishop translations of Octavio Paz to the poet's oceanscapes as a
means to grasp the joy and inevitable losses dealt with by Bishop in poems
where, as Barbara Comins puts it, "the specific recurring trope of the
mysterious, changeable and sometimes joyous sea constituted one of Bishop's
ways of sounding her selfhood and clandestine sexuality" (189).
Almost like bookends for the Place/Memory and The Art of Division sections
are two one-essay sections appearing at the beginning and end of the volume.
At the front, in the section Her Own Prodigal, is the keynote address
from the conference, a piece by Anne Stevenson titled "The Geographical
Mirror." The end of the volume, likewise, contains only Gary Fountain's
essay, "'Maple Leaf (Forever)': Elizabeth Bishop's Politics of National
Identity," in a section called Borderlands. Fountain puts a political
spin on the place question by asking "in what place, in what nation, might
the authentic self, a real but not hidden Elizabeth Bishop, reside comfortably?"(293).
As other essays in the collection deal at least tangentially with questions
of borders, boundaries, and "borderworld[s]" - Brian Bartlett's essay
on Bishop's treatment of coasts is only one example - the purpose of these
choices in organization could, to some degree, be called into question.
But this is a minor issue, marking only slightly a collection in which Bishop's
poems, most especially "Sestina," "The Moose," "In the Waiting Room,"
"The Fish" and others receive a lot of critical attention, attention that
duly notes what these poems offer to their readers in the simple joys
of existing, of truly taking in both interior and exterior scenes, of
capturing the humour in the common tragedies of everyday life. That the
sometimes inexpressible joy encountered in Bishop's work is very often
accompanied by deprivations of all sorts has been skillfully woven into
the analysis of even the most celebratory essays. But it is this type
of focus that may have led the collection to cover, on the whole, some
critical ground more thoroughly than others, both in terms of the poems
treated as well as in the overall affectionate tone of the book.
Still, in spite of (probably also because of) these essayists' affection for
Bishop, their interpretations contribute considerable depth and breadth
to the scholarship. The suggestion may be made that, although Elizabeth
Bishop made her name in the United States, her creativity was irrefutably
launched by an early childhood in a Fundy coastal village. By way of illustration,
in "'It Was to Be': Elizabeth Bishop, the Burning Boy and Other Childish
Marvels," a convincing argument on the power of early influences is seen
in Peter Sanger's insightful reading of "Sestina" and "Casabianca";
"the world of childhood, of Great Village, of an elementary school reader
plays counterpoint to the world of experience, suffering and self-revelation
in the poetry Bishop offered in 1946 when she published North & South"
(48-50). By the same token, the essays by Patricia Dwyer, Marian White
Bannerman, and Jeffery Donaldson, as well as the photo essay by Sandra
Barry "remind us," as Barry does with these words, "that loss is not a
disaster. It is an inevitable part of life. Yet the lost remains as resonant
as the found because of our capacity to remember" (149). That interplay
of joy and loss, critically plumbed, is the basis of Divisions of the
Heart, and it is particularly apparent in that first main section
of the book, Place/Memory, where these essays are located.
Eclecticism is the most striking feature of the other main section of
the book. In examining this notion of a sense of place, The Art of Division
section neatly and nearly runs through the entire twentieth century's
most prominent critical traditions - from formalism to Northrup Frye,
from New Criticism to queer studies. Ted Colson's charming entreaty, "'Over
2,000 Illustrations and a Complete Concordance': A McLuhan Mosaic," has
form echoing argument in its suggestion that the "lists of pictures" in
"Over 2,000 Illustrations" and "In the Waiting Room" make a tactile type
of sense, rather than a linear one (223). In a delightful manner, Colson's
commentary presages the chief and difficult discussion of the book's next
essay, "'The Round, Turning World': Place, Memory and Metaphor in 'In
the Waiting Room.'" In this paper, Michael Happy argues the point "that
there are effectively only two ways to read the art of words we call literature:
metonymically and metaphorically" (229). While some of these essays follow
more obscure paths of critical analysis, they nonetheless offer valuable
connections between the concrete realities of Bishop's life and art, and
the world of critical theory whose aims have been multi-directional in
assessing her work through the years.
Beyond the matters of contents, theme, and style, the book itself, in its
overall design, is a pleasure to read, hold and behold. The cover's shadowy
Bishop signature and the easy to read text inside make for reinforcement
of the idea about the strict placement in the universe Bishop and her
poetry argue for. "Bishop's sensitivity to the functions of geography"(104)
as Lorrie Goldensohn notes in her essay "The Homeless Eye," may have resulted
in her feeling forever homeless, but in the striving for a homeplace her
poetry left its mark - a mark coloured by the red mud of the Bay of Fundy.
The design of Divisions of the Heart echoes this. Gaspereau Press,
who have paid similarly close attention to every book they publish (including
Governor General's Award winner George Elliott Clarke's stark, artful
and courageous collection, Execution Poems), are to be commended
for the simple yet effective way they have put together Divisions of
the Heart.
Finally, what is most impressive about this collection is its thoroughness.
In recreating the Acadia conference in print, the book's able editors
have, in effect, done a great deal more. They have offered to Bishop scholars
and the more general Bishop reader-admirer some engaging enlargements
of that corpus. Fitting accompaniments to the book are Bishop's The
Complete Poems and The Collected Prose; a good, strong, properly
prepared pot of tea and some biscuits; and a comfortable chair - one preferably
with a view of the Bay of Fundy or Great Village, about which and from
which Bishop wrote so perfectly and intricately. For its role in illuminating
her art, Divisions of the Heart, with its many divisions and divinations,
adds up to a probing and useful work.
|