|
Antigonish Review
# 139
| Dale
Estey |
|

Featured Artist
Louise Chisholm
|
|
The Voice is the Story:
Conversations with Canadian Writers of Short Fiction
Edited by Laurie Kruk. (Mosaic Press, 2003. 260pp., $21.00).
Writers Talking
Edited by John Metcalf & Claire Wilkshire.
(The Porcupine's Quill, 2003. 232pp., $19.95).
|
A boon to those who enjoy the observations of writers,
these two books, both published in 2003, offer a wide variety of writers
and opinions. The Voice is the Story concentrates on the short
story form, while Writers Talking has a broader scope. These books
deal solely with contemporary Canadian writers, and flavour much of their
outlook with this aspect in mind.
The Voice is the Story is a compilation of ten
interviews with authors, all except two previously published in various
literary journals. The initial slant (or conceit) of these interviews
is to discuss what 'the voice of the story' is. Although this is
an interesting aspect of any writing genre, and the interviews do often
stray from the topic, there is the feeling of an 'academic' restraint
imposed on the interviews. At the end of the book, the concept of 'voice'
is as nebulous as ever. Voice seems to be whatever the author intends.
As long as that voice remains consistent throughout the work, voice has
been achieved.
The Voice is the Story consists of interviews
with ten well-established authors, ranging from Joan Clark and Jack Hodgins,
to Alistair MacLeod and Carol Shields. There are thorough discussions
about (and references to) a variety of their own works, plus their opinions
concerning the larger writing scene, and the accelerating state of Canadian
literature. Most make comments about Canadian literature having entered
the broad stage of World recognition, during the latter decades of the
last century. Our 'survivalist' mode has branched out significantly, and
Canadian writing is now: a) recognized as a separate and independent literature,
and b) taking its place in both academic and commercial circles. In other
words, we're taken seriously, and we sell.
There is a fusty atmosphere to the interviews in The
Voice is the Story. Although they are basically question-and-answer
encounters, which are then read and edited by the interviewee, there is
a staid quality to many of them. Perhaps this is because they were destined
for Canadian journals, or perhaps the premise of keeping to the topic
of 'voice' restricted a broader net being cast. Writers such as Timothy
Findley and Carol Shields do fly off on their own sometimes, but generally
the ground seems a safe place to be.
There is certainly a broad slant to the 'personal' in
The Voice is the Story. Although author reminiscence may not assist
a reader on learning how to write, the various examples are quite enlightening
about the writing process. The upshot seems to be that anything can trigger
a story, and an author best knows how to mine their own life. The lesson
to be learned is how to identify, and then utilize those familiar experiences
for their creative ends.
One of the most startling observations about writing
in general, to come from either of these books, is by Joan Clark. She
says: "There's this terrible fear, that a writer is going to expose
something that is insidious and dangerous; there's a real fear of artists
in our society, there really is." The societal dangers of writing
might be matched by the personal, according to Elisabeth Harvor. In many
of her stories, she deals with very autobiographical topics, and this
causes strife with family and friends. By extension, it also produced
some negative feelings for the author herself. As she explains it: "But
I also think that one of the main, and possibly not very honourable, reasons
I want to write, is that I need to throw some version of what I think
of as 'my story' down before the World Court of Readers. And to be acquitted."
Writers Talking consists of interviews with eight lesser known
writers, and includes a sample of their work. As a bonus (for writer and
non-writer alike) each author then describes some of the techniques used
in the story presented. This is a grand method to introduce (or 're-present,'
as the editors put it) these authors to a readership, and proves to be
very effective.
The authors in this compilation range from Mary Borsky
and Elise Levine to Steven Heighton and K.D. Miller. Their offerings are
not all short stories, but often 'extracted' from a longer work. An oddity
(which quickly becomes a boon), is the inconsistency in the writers' presentations.
Where one might expect an interesting interview to lead to interesting
fiction, this is not always the case. Nor does the quality of the fiction
equate to insight in the interview. And sometimes the explanation of technique
leaves the reader no further ahead in understanding. One can not make
assumptions, and the reader is kept on their toes. It proves to be exciting
and challenging forage.
The interviews were conducted by mail, so there has been
time for thoughtful and thorough response. It isn't clear if a standard
questionnaire was used for the writers, but even if it was, the results
are far from similar. Most of the authors seem to grab onto a point of
interest (to them) and run with it. To be sure, there are a number of
similarities of topic, but no rote or routine. Perhaps the desires of
the interviewer are not present to guide the discussion.
Often, interviews with authors are supposed to show novice
writers how to write. If someone picks up this book with that intent,
then 'abandon hope all ye who enter here.' There is such a diversity of
outlooks and opinions about writing and the creative process, that it
is impossible to follow all of the divergent paths. Some writers start
with 'plot,' others let 'plot' take care of itself. Some start with 'image,'
some start with 'character.' Some write reams and reams, then edit to
reveal the story, while others would agree with Lisa Moore, who says:
"The more skilled a short story writer is, the less action she needs
to write in order to create drama." One comes away from all the opinions
in this book with many suggestions, and it is up to the individual reader/writer
to test which best suits.
Many 'personal cum professional' observations appear
in Writers Talking. It is enlightening to follow the development
of both 'writing abilities' and 'career.' Canadian careers still seem
wedded to literary magazines and small presses, which implies almost a
sub-genre of books and authors. To attain a larger audience and recognition
(and thus, a sustainable career), an author needs to (almost) enter the
entertainment world, particularly if an international audience is sought.
As K.D. Miller says: "Whatever it's all about, it's not about prizes
or best-seller lists (Though I wouldn't turn my nose up at either.)."
The fiction presented in Writers Talking is, by
and large, an interesting and entertaining collection. We are taken from
such places as the inner workings of a restaurant in Japan by Steven Heighton
in "Five Paintings Of The New Japan," to a phone call and three
characters' interpretations of it in "Always The Snow" by Elise
Levine. Mary Borsky masterfully reveals the workings of family and relationships
in "The Ukrainian Shirt," while K.D. Miller offers a first person
narration, realistic and selfish enough to make us wince, during the course
of "A Litany In The Time Of Plague." None of the stories would
be classed as experimental, and those from longer pieces stand well on
their own.
It may be more for a writer's interest to peruse the
'author's notes' at the end of the fiction, but a general reader will
also appreciate a peek into the 'inner workings.' There is a degree of
intrigue in finding out how the story emerged, the amount of time it took
to write, the changes made (and why) from discarded plot lines and ideas,
to the use of dialogue and (here also) the concept of 'voice.' Sometimes
we are also given the opinion of the writer about the work after the fact.
Has it held up, is the author still pleased, and what changes might now
be made if it were to be written anew?
A couple of the authors make a case for attempting something
different in the writing, and the reader can decide if it has been successful
or not. Michael Winter chooses not to use quotation marks for his dialogue,
or apostrophes for contractions within his dialogue. He courts a 'deliberate
confusion' by the reader to realize which character is speaking. He makes
the assumption that the reader will ultimately have no difficulty keeping
them apart.
Terry Griggs reaches for - and attains - an absurdist
reality in "Momma Had A Baby." To blend different 'worlds' is
one of the most difficult achievements in writing, and to add an element
of 'Did that really happen?' humour into the mix is indeed daring. As
the author herself says about the story: "It's sort of like stepping
on loose gravel, and off you go, propelled with a certain velocity through
the narrative."
Both The Voice is the Story and Writers Talking
are well-produced paperbacks, trade format and comfortable to read. "Writers
Talking" is slightly easier to follow, because the name of each interviewee
is at the top of every page devoted to their section. However, "The
Voice is the Story" does have a thorough index, and uses footnotes
for each interview.
The temptation to end with three quotes will be succumbed
to.
The first is not by any of the authors interviewed, but
quoted by Michael Winter. It is by Norman Levine, and states: "The
less a writer gives the reader, the better."
Steven Heighton says: "Writers teach themselves,
by trial and failure …."
And finally, another author not interviewed states: "The
only thing that matters about a story is whether it is alive or dead."
And that was Mavis Gallant.
|