|
Antigonish Review # 148
| Coralie Hughes
Jensen
Review
|
|

Cover
by Betsy Rosenwald
|
|
Flesh, a Naked Dress
by Susan Andrews Grace.
(Hagios Press, 2006. 95 pp.)
|
"There
are other ways
/ to fight the Adam and Eve in us, with that handy little weapon,
the enchiridion,
/ a dagger against Folly to whom you otherwhere sing praises."
(13)
With this thought from her poem "In this Life One Must Be
On Guard," a poet who puts message on an equal footing with
technique, Susan Andrews Grace begins her collection of poems,
Flesh, a Naked Dress. Original sin, committed by Adam and
Eve and handed down to every one of us, seems to require the Church
to rid us of its ugly stain. Grace takes her chair at the table
with Erasmus, Thomas Moore, and Martin Luther, the great minds
of the Reformation who debated doctrine in the sixteenth century
while failing to address whether or not religion was necessary.
In her poetry, she invites them to come to the Kootenays and to
the desert where life goes on without the rigidity and baggage
religion has instilled.
Grace begins her book by appealing to sixteenth
century Dutch humanist and Catholic priest Desiderius Erasmus,
an illegitimate child of a man who later became a priest. While
Erasmus criticized the excesses of the Roman Church, he still
found its doctrine sound. Early on, he wrote a handbook to help
others follow the doctrine while avoiding the excesses and later
wrote The Praise of Folly, a satire dedicated to Thomas
Moore, in which he illustrates the formalism of the Church and
how its inflexibility detracts from the acts of true faith. In
"Paternity's Question," Grace tries to convince Erasmus,
using his own personal experience, that the problems in the Church
are intrinsic to organized religion and cannot be solved by minor
adjustments. Even after the Reformation, the excesses still exist
- even today in the Kootenays, the Rockies in British Columbia
- "There were priests here too / and probably fathered children
like you under the lodgepoles / and woven reed roofs, they left
the mothers. It happened everywhere." (15) Throughout her
collection, the poet refers to the transgressions of monks and
priests who vowed celibacy. "The Bishop prances behind the
cross, Folly says, / ignoring his vow against carnal affection,
lustily / tripping the pretty boys: he has frocked and gloved
his filth." (19)
While corruption runs rampant in the Church, Grace's
forests follow God's plan without the doctrine. She invites Erasmus
to her forests that "shade secrets too. Where does God reside?
/ You'll love this Erasmus: it's rich: / all trace of human and
divine erased. Here in the Kootenays / two, maybe three, generations
of memory."(13). Grace isn't sure Luther's plan to reform
the Church took care of the problems within it. "Fire started
in the middle of the cloth / not along the torn edge, where you
were bruised / tearing yourself away, trying to be faithful."
(77) Admittedly, nature also possesses its share of abuses and
excesses, and this is where memory is too short to feel the weight
of centuries of doctrine. The grizzly eats the roots of the defenceless
glacier lily in "Erythronium Grandiflorum." Nature
is not without pain, and God's plan includes the intricate food
chain that is necessary to the survival of the species - something
that Grace warns us, "Don't look closely: you see nature
better / from the corner of your eye." (38) But nature still
seems to handle life better than religion, which hands us centuries
of others' sins to carry. "Erasmus, had the people here stayed
lost in the moon, never seen God's sun / borrowed by Christians
who considered themselves greater than Christ, they would / have
been saved. But God's sun was brought here." (21) We are
all sinners, but how does the arrival of God's "sun,"
Jesus, change us? Are we better because the Church tells us how
to behave when its agents misbehave? And why must we carry the
burden of our sins - often created and defined by men who tell
us they know what God wants? A few lines later, she again tells
us that nature is better for its lack of memory, of doctrine.
"It makes / no difference to the lily or the sparrow what
we've done / or not done, a chasm of forgetting / swallows the
trace." (21)
Grace writes about Thomas Moore as referenced
by Erasmus' The Praise of Folly. She chastises Erasmus
for not recognizing that Moore was in grave peril. "More's
the pity / you couldn't have foreseen and forewarned the bloody
end too. / And you the intellectual titan: such foolery."
(17) Martin Luther fairs no better. In "Auctoritus vs.
Traditio," she writes, "Luther knows the difference
between papism and his invisible church for holy men, a club /
Augustine most likely could not join: the true church." (51)
But while Grace acknowledges Luther's contributions to Reformation,
she invites him to see what it is like in the city. In "Luther
in the Desert," she writes, "Evil resides outside this
nursery where / a parrot talks to a child off school for Martin
Luther King / Day. Evil rolls in the dust and in the nickels pulsing
through / the city's capillaries, stupid machine - eyes click
fruits and / numbers." (85)
When she answers Erasmus' The Praise of Folly,
she includes the same playfulness that he had when he wrote it
centuries ago, "Who's to believe you Erasmus, writing of
such tomfoolery as / the fool who was Foolish Tom, not a Tom Fool,
and tricked his wife with false jewels." (14) Thomas Moore's
beliefs were serious. He did not believe that gold or jewels had
the value that society put on them. But Grace seems to want Moore
and the others to address another issue that the intellects of
Reformation did not - original sin and its burden on women. In
"Joy of the Proper Tool," Grace plays with the reader,
but the meaning seems to be quite serious. "Mistakes! Look
to the jimson flower / its shocking tawdriness / roadside vaginal
throat / open / waves its panties at you / as you drive by / not
making mistakes." (36) Who is the sinner here? The Eve who
tempts Adam or the driver who judges her?
But Susan Grace also has a romantic side. She
uses the beauty of the nature around her to show what happens
when nature works without organized religion. It is here the reader
sees the poet's passion. In "Joy of the Proper Tool,"
Grace moves from debate with Erasmus and weaves God into life
in nature. She writes, "Spruce trees listen to stories /
shroud closer / a man lost in the forest not homeless / no matter
how naked." (29) The reader sees reference to both religion,
as dealing with "men of the cloth" and fabric as a "shroud"
that protects nature from doctrine. Grace again mentions cloth
when she describes how the inevitability of life - perhaps that
planning and praying do little to change it. "Lay out that
intricately woven life, its warp necessity, its weft circumstance:
/ permeability / is like that: relentless in the way it argues
/ unto death."(35) Again cloth is emphasized when she writes,
"grosgrain winceyette nainsook / jacquard paisley stockingett
jersey / duffel nankeen corduroy / twill & moleskin dimity sharkskin
/ calico taffeta and moiré: foreskin - " (37) But could there
be another image that Grace talks about here? Could it be the
solution to the shame a woman should feel because her naked body
leads to man's downfall? Is it the onus the woman must carry to
atone for the sins of Eve? Grace finishes her collection with
"An Event in the World." Here, she again returns to
the responsibility for original sin. She writes about women from
the fourth century on, warning them that they are wind and wood
and that "Your growing wood penetrates, you the apple / the
tree, the problem, its knowledge - / chaste or no, the same desert.
Christ's coming is a kiss / given or withheld: the same you are
guilty." (92)
Throughout her collection, Susan Andrews Grace
creates images not only of nature but also of cloth used both
to protect the wearer and to burden her. The rhythm of her words
lulls the reader like the wind, and her descriptions are superb.
But it is the meanings of her sometimes shocking images that made
this reviewer eagerly reread the collection several times, each
time understanding more references and images, realizing the depth
and importance of the poet's message. Grace is open about the
silliness of sixteenth century reforms and clearly finds nature
in the Kootenays and the desert, where organized religion plays
little role, more appealing. Just as in nature, people sustain
themselves with food and interaction with others of their kind.
And as such they will take what they need, not worrying about
sin, or in the case of the homeless person on Decatur Boulevard
or the seductive jimson flower by the highway, how it is judged
by others who seem to prefer to follow the doctrine. But it is
the role of Adam and Eve as the foundation of organized religion
that seems to irk her the most. Whether it is a "vermillion
blanket" or a "sweater of greenness" or "red
silk shoes," Grace reminds us of a woman's burden when she
writes "Flesh, a naked dress - / tissues sewn with bloody
threads / swims in air, frantic / sinks and gives back to the
sun / dry drowning." (66) Tearing away the burden of centuries
is not easy. Paradise is the island where a woman lives among
the flowers of her garden. Unfortunately, she must leave her paradise
from time to time and it is off the island where evil resides.
In "Flesh, a Naked Dress" a woman in death is finally
able to shed her burden. "She leaves the mountain / in a
flurry of clothing: the Good is her ethereal casing, / her idea
of here. / Her feet cut by cinders from a burnt century / remind
her / she is without All and One. / He will get into the boat
and / she will wave to him from the sky, / impeccably naked."
(69)
|