|
Antigonish Review # 148
| Robert Edison
Sandiford
Review
|
|

Cover
by Betsy Rosenwald
|
|
Bridges across Oceans
Margaret Laurence: The Making of a Writer
by Donez Xiques.
(Dundurn Press, 2005. 408 pp., $40.00)
|
The Making of
a Writer begins at the end of Laurence's life, with the author
dying of cancer, writing her memoirs then taking an overdose of
pills January 5, 1987, to spare her children from having to care
for her as she deteriorated. Laurence was predictably celebrated
in the international press, identified by the obvious details:
her Canadian Prairies upbringing in a strong Scots-Irish family;
her unyielding desire to be a writer; her anti-war activism and
generosity to fellow writers. Less obvious, perhaps, were her
early years as a writer, travelling between Canada, England and
particularly Africa, with her husband and two children; years
of struggle in finding her own voice and that of her people.
What Xiques, an American writer and academic,
proposes to present is a Margaret Laurence whose apprenticeship
as a writer was not as North American as, say, the newspapers'
elegies might suggest. She makes much - and rightly so - of Laurence's
stay in Africa from 1950-1957. Since Xiques' biography stops short
with the publication of Laurence's first novel, This Side
Jordan (1960), the relation of the author of the translation
A Tree for Poverty: Somali Poetry and Prose (1954)
to that of the Manawaka stories of the early sixties and seventies
is not fully realized. Yet a landscape, like a language, serves
to inform a writer.
The Prairies obviously meant much to Laurence,
the "moss-hairy fallen logs and the white promise of wild
strawberry blossoms…." But so, for a time, did Africa. Xiques
speculates: "Perhaps looking at her father's copies of National
Geographic had provided an impetus for her imagination. Composing
childhood stories of voyages and adventures in faraway lands may
somehow have become a part of Laurence's psyche, preparing the
way for her later travels." The author concludes, "Who
can say?" and we agree. The guesswork, here as elsewhere
regarding motives and manners, seems pointlessly idle. The fact
was Margaret "Peggy" Wemyss' husband, Jack Laurence,
was a restless engineer who never felt comfortable in a job unless
it was, it seemed, literally earth shaking. He found his greatest
challenges in places distant from his native land.
In these places, and (based on the evidence Xiques
provides) through her extensive, soul-sustaining correspondence
with Canadian novelist Adele Wiseman, Laurence came to the realization
that her own roots were in Canada rather than, say, Scotland -
in a history "that has the most powerful hold over us in
unsuspected ways, the names or tunes or trees that can recall
a thousand images, and this almost-family history can be related
only to one's first home." This is where the emotional rather
than factual resonance between Laurence's life and her fiction
gains ground. More significant than what happens to us can be
how we feel about it afterward, or continue to react to it years
later, and how events change us. Before coming to a fuller appreciation
of Canada, Laurence's first real homes with her husband were in
the British Somaliland Protectorate (now the unrecognized Republic
of Somaliland) and the Gold Coast (now Ghana). It is further interesting
to note the struggle of Canadian writers to be viewed as other
than British or American, and to have their work accepted on its
own terms, is only 60, 70 years old - a short time, really, as
far as literary traditions run.
While many expatriate women around her embraced
the life of the memsahib, Laurence (and her husband) abhorred
it. Laurence railed against British colonialism in her life and
work, considering herself "open-minded" to Africa and
not at all condescending. Her view was an identifiably Canadian
one (if not shared by all Canadians) and, what's more, post-colonial.
Although they knew they would never be part of the people they
visited, lived with or worked alongside, she and Jack had a desire
to see and learn the lands they inhabited, whether together or
apart.
Laurence carried this desire into her art. Xiques
provides a fine example in "Mrs. Cathcart, In and Out of
Purdah," an unpublished short story from the period included
in the book's appendices. There would be many others. Of course,
there is no denying Laurence found it exceedingly trying to fight
the sense she may be writing her novels, stories and radio scripts
in a kind of void. It took her a long time to hear back from editors
to whom she submitted material. (Story's acceptance letter
for "Uncertain Flowering" reached her a year and a half
after it was sent.) On rough days, she could be as much at odds
with her subject matter as with her responsibility to it. Laurence
remained concerned about forging a literature based on where she
was from even as she continued to write about where she lived.
Wiseman offered some guidance on the matter; she advised her friend
"to look to literature not simply as a by-product but as
a prime value, as the expression of the quality of a society,
as witness to the soul of a culture." Laurence's stories
- about the struggle of Africa and Africans to free themselves
from the burden of empire - were not unfamiliar. Both
the past and present were available to her. The future would take
care of itself if she did her job right.
Laurence came to believe as a writer that "a
theme should be as simple as birth or death - something that can
be summed up in a single sentence and yet whose ramifications
are so wide that it can never be entirely said at all." In
much the same way, Xiques' focus on Laurence's African years serves
her biography well. Aside from the overuse of words like "however"
and "nevertheless," her prose is rather straightforward,
and her attempts to reveal her subject become more engaging when
she lets us hear from Laurence directly, especially via her letters
to Wiseman. In fact, the occasional correction of what Laurence
remembers in her posthumously published memoirs, Dance on the
Earth (1989), by what she recorded at the time of an event's
unfolding in her letters is a useful reminder of the unavoidable
subjectivity of all acts of recollection. Yet Xiques, despite
the annoying and inconsistent technique of shifting from Peggy
to Peg to Margaret in identifying Laurence at different stages
in her life; despite extensive references and interviews; despite
a narrative structure of recapitulation and repetition, writes
with a palpable sense of distance. It is possible this lack of
penetration has something to do with Laurence's habit of destroying
her unpublished work. Laurence, who was neither as shy nor as
stolid as many thought, apparently had a talent for obliterating
parts of herself; those, it's easy to surmise, she wanted no one
ever to see.
What we do see in Xiques' young Laurence is a
writer seeking to understand her place in the world, regardless
of the part of the world she inhabits, and her connection to others,
regardless of class, age, sex, or race. Africa was where she not
only wrote her first truly professional work, it was the setting
of many of her stories. Laurence embraced the rhythms of the peoples
and cultures she encountered. She was more than a traveller passing
through, on tour with her busy husband. Laurence had what the
author calls a "basic life-view that could say, even then,
a man is never God, even in his own domain, and one should not
mould the lives of others." This sentiment is one that was
reinforced in Africa and surfaces in her collection The Tomorrow-Tamer
(1963). We hear again and again, from friends and colleagues,
how Laurence was always the type of person on whom nothing was
lost and to whom questions about the world in which she lived
came forcefully. In Genoa, she "noted the marble angels among
the dark cypress trees. Her memory of that sight was to give her,
fourteen years later, the paradoxical image that provided the
title for her first major success as a novelist, The Stone
Angel (1964)."
Laurence's lifelong theme, in Xiques' view, was
"the significance of freedom and responsibility, both for
individuals and for nations." But then much of Africa, to
Laurence, recalled the beauty and harshness of the Prairies. In
Margaret Laurence: The Making of a Writer, we see
Laurence developing across these two landscapes - one immediate,
the other remembered, and who could say which was which sometimes?
- ripening in her concerns for and expressions of both. The British
Somaliland Protectorate was Peggy's home for "a little less
than two years [yet] the land and its people had a radical and
lasting impact on her." A healthy curiosity and enthusiasm
also must have helped to make it feel less like building bridges
across oceans. Laurence was not only forging an identity for herself
as a Canadian but as a Canadian writer, a battle still waged by
many of our writers at home and abroad. She was developing fast,
increasingly aware of what she should write and how. She did this
by using the traditions, questions and conflicts of another place
to discover, confront and interpret those of her own, creating
fusions of African stories filtered through a nascent Canadian
sensibility - at that stage in her career.
Upon her death, and after numerous moves, "more
than one hundred books dealing with African material still remained
in her personal library." The point Xiques tries to make
is clear, but the emphasis seems wrong. It's not so surprising
that reflections of Africa became less pronounced, the fusions,
less overt, in Laurence's later writing. She would turn to more
immediate issues once back home in Canada. What couldn't and wouldn't
be diminished was her indebtedness. Of her sixteen published books,
six deal with Africa, in part or in whole. No further proof of
how Laurence's experience of the place caused her to grow more
self-assured, about herself or her writing, need be found in books
other than her own.
|